Follow

Wider-war roadmap

Public edition ·

Title

Omega War: Unthinkable — wider-war roadmap

Recorded

2026-10-29

Owner direction

Put wider-war ideas on the roadmap; prioritise the enlarged southern campaign and the five core briefings.

Status

Future research/design backlog. No release dates, expansion budgets or implementation promises.

Active

Core Germany campaigns; southern Bohemian front under research and design.

Entries
Danube: the occupation breaks
Id

danube

Title

Danube: the occupation breaks

Priority

1

Baseline

Austria had four occupation zones and a separately divided Vienna. The Soviet zone was not simply all land east of a single straight frontier.

Divergence

The German war ends four-power cooperation. Local clashes isolate occupation detachments and expand into a campaign across Upper/Lower Austria.

Forces

US and British occupation forces, French western-zone forces, Soviet forces; Austrian police and volunteers initially, not a ready post-1955 Austrian army. Polish II Corps reinforcements compete with its Bavarian assignment.

Places

Linz, the Enns, St Pölten, Vienna; Salzburg and the Alpine approaches as rear areas.

Connection

Direct continuation of the southern German front. Passau and Regensburg provide the geographical hint; do not promise a particular German-campaign result.

Constraint

Keep US Forces Austria distinct from Third Army unless a scenario order transfers control. French western Austria and contested Vienna matter.

Sources

austria

Status

Backlog — research before production

Depends on

Core campaign/OOB foundation

Shared cross-theatre manpower, equipment, air and shipping ledger

Acceptance

Historical starting conditions and explicit divergence agreed

National commands and dated parent formations documented

Distinct operational geography and campaign premise

Scope and assets estimated before production

Adriatic: the Morgan Line
Id

adriatic

Title

Adriatic: the Morgan Line

Priority

2

Baseline

The Morgan Line separated Allied and Yugoslav military control in disputed Venezia Giulia. Trieste’s final settlement was still being negotiated in 1946.

Divergence

Border violence and a Yugoslav attempt to alter the settlement draw British/US troops and selected rearming Italian formations into open war.

Forces

British and US occupation formations, Italian cobelligerent/rebuilt units; Yugoslav Army. Italian readiness and Allied arms restrictions need an explicit wartime change.

Places

Trieste, Gorizia, the Isonzo/Soča approaches, Ljubljana corridor; southern Austria connects the theatre.

Connection

Shares Mediterranean shipping and reserves with Austria. Slovenia and Croatia are geographic regions within Yugoslavia, not independent 1946 armies.

Constraint

Tito can cooperate with Moscow while pursuing Yugoslav aims. Do not assume later 1948 relations or unquestioning Soviet tactical control.

Sources

italy

Status

Backlog — research before production

Depends on

Core campaign/OOB foundation

Shared cross-theatre manpower, equipment, air and shipping ledger

Acceptance

Historical starting conditions and explicit divergence agreed

National commands and dated parent formations documented

Distinct operational geography and campaign premise

Scope and assets estimated before production

Aegean: civil war becomes an international front
Id

aegean

Title

Aegean: civil war becomes an international front

Priority

3

Baseline

Greece faced internal conflict and disputed frontier assistance to guerrillas from its northern neighbours; UN investigation followed late in 1946.

Divergence

A conventional offensive from Bulgaria and/or Yugoslavia is a new WW3 event. Soviet and Romanian formations require a transit and concentration plan through the Balkans.

Forces

Greek Army remains central; British troops initially, US expeditionary formations later after transport. Greek communist guerrillas are distinct from Soviet, Bulgarian, Yugoslav and Albanian regular forces. Free Romanian/Bulgarian units grow here only after recruitment.

Places

Thessaloniki, Macedonia, Thrace and Aegean ports; western frontier operations form a different axis.

Connection

Provides the home theatre for Balkan exile contingents and a bridge to Turkish Thrace.

Constraint

Romania does not border Greece. Do not make irregular forces an instantly unified Soviet field army or treat Greek civilians as one political bloc.

Sources

greece

greek-support

Status

Backlog — research before production

Depends on

Core campaign/OOB foundation

Shared cross-theatre manpower, equipment, air and shipping ledger

Acceptance

Historical starting conditions and explicit divergence agreed

National commands and dated parent formations documented

Distinct operational geography and campaign premise

Scope and assets estimated before production

Turkey and Iran: the Straits and the eastern frontier
Id

straits

Title

Turkey and Iran: the Straits and the eastern frontier

Priority

4

Baseline

Soviet pressure over the Turkish Straits and the Soviet troop-withdrawal crisis in Iran were real issues in 1946.

Divergence

Moscow refuses or reverses its Iranian withdrawal; pressure on Turkey becomes open war. Choose either a Balkan/Thracian offensive, a Caucasian offensive, or a phased combination.

Forces

Turkish and Iranian national forces first; Soviet forces from the Caucasus and selected Balkan groupings; British/US air, naval and later ground support.

Places

Turkish Thrace, Bosphorus and Dardanelles; Kars/Erzurum; Iranian Azerbaijan and routes toward northern Iran.

Connection

Aegean events affect Turkey, but eastern Anatolia is also directly exposed to the Soviet Caucasus. Iran is not a prerequisite for that threat.

Constraint

Treat western and eastern Turkey as distinct operational theatres with long supply distances. Historical Soviet withdrawal from Iran must not silently become a permanent occupation.

Sources

iran-turkey

Status

Backlog — research before production

Depends on

Core campaign/OOB foundation

Shared cross-theatre manpower, equipment, air and shipping ledger

Acceptance

Historical starting conditions and explicit divergence agreed

National commands and dated parent formations documented

Distinct operational geography and campaign premise

Scope and assets estimated before production

Northern approaches: Norway, Finland and the Baltic
Id

north

Title

Northern approaches: Norway, Finland and the Baltic

Priority

5

Baseline

Finland pursued a constrained postwar policy; Sweden retained neutrality. The historical Danish occupation-brigade agreement came in 1947.

Divergence

Choose the trigger: Soviet movement toward northern Norway, coercive transit demands on Finland, or a Baltic crisis. Swedish entry requires a separate decision or attack.

Forces

Norwegian and Danish national forces, British/US expeditionary support and Soviet forces. Finland can resist, accommodate or be coerced; Sweden may remain neutral or mobilise independently.

Places

Finnmark and the Arctic approaches; southern Scandinavia and the Baltic form a separate operational focus.

Connection

Denmark protects the northern land/sea approaches while Polish and British forces fight in northern Germany.

Constraint

Neither Finland nor Sweden is automatically a Soviet ally. Amphibious/air/naval logistics make this a distinct production scope.

Sources

finland

sweden

denmark

Status

Backlog — research before production

Depends on

Core campaign/OOB foundation

Shared cross-theatre manpower, equipment, air and shipping ledger

Acceptance

Historical starting conditions and explicit divergence agreed

National commands and dated parent formations documented

Distinct operational geography and campaign premise

Scope and assets estimated before production

Asian war: a sequel-scale setting
Id

asia

Title

Asian war: a sequel-scale setting

Priority

6

Baseline

China’s civil war was unresolved in 1946; the People’s Republic belongs to 1949. Postwar occupation and colonial conflicts competed for Allied forces.

Divergence

The European war changes Soviet withdrawal, arms transfers and foreign intervention. Choose a primary theatre before extending the conflict across Asia.

Forces

Chinese Nationalists and Communists, Soviet Far Eastern forces, US occupation forces and Commonwealth contingents; Japanese rearmament is a separate, major fictional decision.

Places

Manchuria / northern China and the Korean occupation boundary first; Japan as a base and vulnerable occupation commitment. Indochina and Indonesia are separate political wars.

Connection

Europe cannot receive the same Australian/NZ or US formations still committed here. Every cross-theatre transfer has one persistent identity.

Constraint

Do not import the 1950 Korean War, a unified Communist China, independent 1948 Korean states or later equipment into 1946.

Sources

china

indochina

Status

Backlog — research before production

Depends on

Core campaign/OOB foundation

Shared cross-theatre manpower, equipment, air and shipping ledger

Acceptance

Historical starting conditions and explicit divergence agreed

National commands and dated parent formations documented

Distinct operational geography and campaign premise

Scope and assets estimated before production

India and the imperial settlement
Id

india

Title

India and the imperial settlement

Priority

7

Baseline

Independent India and Pakistan emerged in 1947 in actual history; 1946 begins with British India and competing political demands.

Divergence

Global war and the existing Churchill-election divergence alter the timing and terms of withdrawal. Choose whether independence accelerates, is delayed, or produces a different partition.

Forces

British Indian Army and British formations, with recruitment and political loyalties evolving. Later Indian/Pakistani forces need a defined independence and asset-division event.

Places

Initially ports, garrisons and imperial supply routes; any frontier campaign requires its own conflict premise.

Connection

Manpower used in the Mediterranean or Asia competes with domestic stability and demobilisation.

Constraint

Do not treat the Indian Army as an unlimited interchangeable imperial reserve or assume the historical 1947 settlement survives unchanged.

Sources

india

indochina

Status

Backlog — research before production

Depends on

Core campaign/OOB foundation

Shared cross-theatre manpower, equipment, air and shipping ledger

Acceptance

Historical starting conditions and explicit divergence agreed

National commands and dated parent formations documented

Distinct operational geography and campaign premise

Scope and assets estimated before production

Africa and the Americas: a consequential rear
Id

rear

Title

Africa and the Americas: a consequential rear

Priority

8

Baseline

Do not assume a 1946 Latin American communist-state bloc. Cuba’s later revolutionary government belongs to a different period and Cuba is in the Caribbean.

Divergence

Use shipping, bases, oil, food, recruitment and domestic political pressures before inventing new continental land fronts.

Forces

National governments and colonial administrations with their own interests. African territories and South American states supply resources and routes without becoming automatic combat factions.

Places

Suez / North African routes, Cape shipping, Atlantic ports and American industrial supply.

Connection

Supply losses and colonial unrest can constrain the European war without requiring another campaign map.

Constraint

Strategic importance does not require a playable land campaign. A specific intervention or revolutionary victory needs a researched local premise.

Sources

cuba

indochina

Status

Backlog — research before production

Depends on

Core campaign/OOB foundation

Shared cross-theatre manpower, equipment, air and shipping ledger

Acceptance

Historical starting conditions and explicit divergence agreed

National commands and dated parent formations documented

Distinct operational geography and campaign premise

Scope and assets estimated before production

Cross cutting

Allied Defence Pact remains the recommended fictional coalition framework; exact treaty/appointments pending.

Do not duplicate formations between Germany, Austria, Mediterranean and Asian theatres.

Finland/Sweden participation requires a national decision; 1947/1949 states must not be backdated into 1946.

Authority

Game Bible Book VIII; future scope only